I figure if it looks like a Mac, feels like a Mac and acts like a Mac then its a Mac.
I prolly won't end up getting one in 2010 anyway so what's my worry?
BTW, have you seen all the room inside the DEV model?
Friday, June 10, 2005
MacTel? Inple?
After giving it much thought, I have finally decided that I don't care about the whole Apple / Intel chippy thing.
I figure if it looks like a Mac, feels like a Mac and acts like a Mac then its a Mac.
I prolly won't end up getting one in 2010 anyway so what's my worry?
BTW, have you seen all the room inside the DEV model?
I figure if it looks like a Mac, feels like a Mac and acts like a Mac then its a Mac.
I prolly won't end up getting one in 2010 anyway so what's my worry?
BTW, have you seen all the room inside the DEV model?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
now that's the true spirit
executivex
How about Macintel.
OK! OK! We must stop this!
I've been doing lots of reading and Richard posted, among his many great links, this article from Mac World, which does a good job of covering pretty much all the questions I had, even the issue of the commitment to the 64 bit processor. (I didn't know Intel had a 64 bit chip, having no need to know.)
But this does present me with more to think about in terms of what I will buy next and when to buy it. It's not looking like an easy decision right now.
Post a Comment